I’m working on a philosophy writing question and need support to help me study.
Does Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological understanding of time provide a meaningful alternative to McTaggart’s A series and B series?
Your paper should have an introduction with a clear thesis that previews your argumentation. You should also take time in the paper to address possible counter arguments to your claim, but to show why these arguments are wrong (e.g.: some may say that X…but this is not correct because Y).
Papers should be 2500 to 3000 words. APA style. Include at least 3 peer-reviewed sources with hyper link applicable to read, in addition to the McTaggart and the Merleau-Ponty YouTube videos below:
Evaluations of the paper will be based on:
-following assignment instructions
-your demonstrated understanding of Merleau-Ponty, McTaggart and any others you bring into the paper.
-dialogue paper requirements (see rubric below)
Papers failing to meet the word count will be deducted 10 percent per 100 words short/in excess of the requirements.