Please respond to the following:
Read Case 2.1: Hacking into Harvard, located here or on page 71 inyour textbook. As applicants began to defend themselves against the penaltieshanded out by the business schools, they appealed to both consequentialist andnonconsequentialist criteria to support their actions. Some responded bypointing out that their intentions were never malicious, while others arguedthey did not think checking their application statuses would cause any realharm. Review the case study and analyze the actions of the students from aKantian perspective. Consider whether the actions taken by the hackers werepermissible according the standard of universal acceptability.
