Ashford3: – Week 2 – Assignment
Elected and Appointed Leadership
Compare and contrast elected andappointed law enforcement positions. With regard to law enforcementlabor-management relations, identify and explain three major issues that mustbe addressed by leadership during the labor-management negotiation process. Compareand contrast the differences between elected and appointed leadership positionsand explain the impact on law enforcement labor-management relations issues inrelation to each position. Finally, discuss how the form of government (i.e.,council, mayoral, or managerial) differs in terms of the influence that may beapplied to an elected versus appointed leader.
Compareand contrast elected and appointed law enforcement positions. With regard tolaw enforcement labor-management relations, identify and explain three majorissues that must be addressed by leadership during the labor-managementnegotiation process. Compare and contrast the differences between elected andappointed leadership positions and explain the impact on law enforcementlabor-management relations issues in relation to each position. Finally,discuss how the form of government (i.e., council, mayoral, or managerial)differs in terms of the influence that may be applied to an elected versusappointed leader.
The paper must be three to fivepages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formattedaccording to APA style. You must use at least two scholarly resources (at least one from the Ashford Online Library)other than the textbook to support your claims and subclaims. Cite yourresources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APAsamples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the LearningResources tab on the left navigation toolbar.
Description:
Total Possible Score: 10.00
Identifies and Explains Three Major IssuesRelated to Elected Versus Appointed Officials That Must be Addressed byLeadership During the Labor-Management Negotiation Process.
Total: 2.50
Distinguished- Identifies and explains at least three major issues related to electedand appointed official that must be addressed during the labor-managementnegotiation process. The identified issues are appropriate and relevant to thetopic.
Proficient- Identifies and explains three major issues related to elected and appointedofficial that must be addressed during the labor-management negotiationprocess. The identified issues are appropriate to the topic. Minor details aremissing from the explanation.
Basic- Identifies and explains three issues related to elected and appointedofficial that must be addressed during the labor-management negotiationprocess. The identified issues may not be entirely appropriate or notsignificant to the topic. Relevant details are missing from the explanation.
BelowExpectations – Identifies and attempts to explain at least two issues relatedto elected and appointed official that must be addressed during thelabor-management negotiation process. The identified issues are not appropriateand/or not significant to the topic.Significant details are missing from the
Non-Performance- The identification and explanation of issues related to elected and appointedofficials are either nonexistent or lack the components described in theassignment instructions.
Compares and Contrasts the Differences BetweenElected and Appointed Leadership Positions and Explain the Impact on LawEnforcement Labor-Management Relations Issues in Relation to Each Position
Total: 3.00
Distinguished- Comprehensively compares and contrasts the differences between elected andappointed leadership and thoroughly explains the impact each position has onlabor-management relations issues.
Proficient- Compares and contrasts the differences between elected and appointedleadership and explains the impact each position has on labor-managementrelations issues. The compare/contrast or explanation is slightlyunderdeveloped.
Basic- Briefly compares and contrasts a few of the differences between elected andappointed leadership and somewhat explains the impact each position has onlabor-management relations issues. The compare/contrast or explanation isunderdeveloped.
BelowExpectations – Attempts to compare and contrast the differences between electedand appointed leadership and explain the impact each position has onlabor-management; however, the compare/contrast and/or explanation issignificantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance- The comparison and contrast of the differences between elected and appointedleadership and the explanation of the impact of these issues on labor-management relations are either nonexistent or lack the components described inthe assignment instructions.
Discusses How the Form of Government Differsin Terms of the Influence that May be Applied to an Elected Versus AppointedLeader.
Total: 3.00
Distinguished- Thoroughly discusses how the form of government differs in terms of theinfluence that may be applied to an elected versus appointed leader.
Proficient- Discusses how the form of government differs in terms of the influence thatmay be applied to an elected versus appointed leader. The discussion is missingsome minor details.
Basic- Minimally discusses how the form of government differs in terms of theinfluence that may be applied to an elected versus appointed leader. Thediscussion is missing relevant details
BelowExpectations – Attempts to discuss how the form of government differs in termsof the influence that may be applied to an elected versus appointed leader;however, the discussion is missing significant details.
Non-Performance- The discussion of how the form of government differs in influence as itapplies to elected or appointed officials is either nonexistent or lacks thecomponents described in the assignment instructions.
Critical Thinking: Evidence
Total: 0.25
Distinguished- Employs persuasive information from credible sources to develop an ampleanalysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinizedthoroughly.
Proficient- Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysisof the topic.
Basic- Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect theapplication of such information toward the analysis of the topic.
BelowExpectations – Displays information from external sources, but such informationmay lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects the application of suchinformation toward the analysis of the topic.
Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 0.25
Distinguished- Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered,delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
Proficient- Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enoughrelevant information for an adequate understanding.
Basic- Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal informationfor a basic understanding.
BelowExpectations – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may notdeliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.
Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax andMechanics
Total: 0.25
Distinguished- Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics,such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easyto understand.
Proficient- Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such asspelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and ismostly easy to understand.
Basic- Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling andgrammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract thereader.
BelowExpectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics,such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, whichdistract the reader.
Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.25
Distinguished- Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page,and reference page.
Proficient- Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a fewminor errors.
Basic- Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However,layout does not meet all APA requirements.
BelowExpectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There arefrequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished- The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignmentdescription.
Proficient- The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignmentdescription.
Basic- The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in theassignment description.
BelowExpectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.
Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished- Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compellingevidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and citedcorrectly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient- Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources onthe reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of theassignment.
Basic- Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sourcesmay not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within thebody of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
BelowExpectations – Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or nosupport for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on thereference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations arenot formatted correctly.
Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.
There needs to be a introduction thesis, andconclusions along with questions answered. A title page, and a reference page. I includedthe grading rubic so you can see ho it is graded thanks
This might also help
DeLord, R., & Sanders, J. (2006, August). Police labor-management relations (vol. I): Perspective andpractical solution for implementing change, making reforms, and handling crisisfor managers and union leaders. U.S. Department of Justice,Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Retrieved from http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/files/ric/Publications/e07063417.pdf
Required Text
Delord, R., Shannon, M., Burpo, J.,& Spearing, J. (Eds.). (2008). Police union power, politics, andconfrontation in the 21st century: New challenges, new issues (2nd ed.).United States of America: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Ltd.
- To successfully complete this week’s assignments, readthe following chapters from the text, Police Union Power, Politics andConfrontation in the 21st Century:
- Chapter Fourteen – Principle of Police UnionEndorsement
- Chapter Fifteen – How to Assist the Candidate
- Chapter Sixteen – An Important Question to Ask AboutEndorsement: Whom Do We Endorse?
- Chapter Three – Policing and Police Labor Relations inAustralia: Similarities and Contrasts with the United States ofAmerica
- Chapter Four – Policing and Police Labor Relations inCanada: Similarities and Contrasts with the United States
- Chapter Eight – A Chief’s Willingness to Share PowerHas Been the Secret to Success
- Chapter Nine – A Radical Approach to Reform AngersPolice Unions
You can find the first text online.
