In the Mack Massey Motors v Garnica case, the issue is whether the defendants made and breached an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
- Should the law recognize fitness for a particular purpose?
- Did Massey Motors act unethically in this case?
- Do you think damages should have been awarded?
- A one- to two-page (250- to 500-word) paper
Step 2: Answer the questions posed above.
Write a one- to two-page (250- to 500-word) responding to the questions 1-3 above.