The Mozart Effect Writing Homework Help

Assignment 3: The Mozart Effect

In this assignment, you will read an article aboutthe Mozart effect and identify various parts of the research process. Thisexercise will help you learn how to read a research article and to understandthe research process.

Read the following article:

  • Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L., & Ky, K. N.(1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365. 6447:611. (October 14, 1993). (ProQuest Document ID 76004658).

In your article summary, respond to the followingquestions:

  • Statethe research hypothesis in your own words. Identify the independent anddependent variables.
  • Whatwere some variables the researchers controlled in their study? Why wasthis necessary?
  • Whatevidence do the researchers offer as a test of their hypothesis? Is thisevidence empirical (observable)? Is it valid?
  • Whatexplanation do the researchers offer for their findings? Does the evidencejustify this explanation?

Read the following article:

Jenkins, J.S. (2001). TheMozart effect. Journal of the Royal Society ofMedicine, 94, 170-172.

Based on your readings, respond to the following:

  • Doyou think there is any merit in the study (Rauscher, Shaw, & Ky,1993)? Give three reasons for your position.
  • Doesthe study take individual differences in spatial ability into account?Explain your answer.
  • Whatare two ways in which the experiment could be modified to make the resultsmore generalizable?

Write a 5–6-page paper in Word format. Apply APAstandards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention:LastnameFirstInitial_M1_A3.doc.

By Wednesday, July 31, 2013, deliver yourassignment to the M1: Assignment 3 Dropbox.

Assignment 3 Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

Accurately identified and described the research hypothesisand variables studied in the research article. Identified any controlvariables, and explained the necessity of controlling them.

12

Evaluated validity of the evidence presented as atest of the hypothesis in the research article.

12

Evaluated interpretation of results in theresearch article.

12

Critically assessed the merit of the researchstudy providing at least three reasons.

12

Evaluated whether the test took into accountindividual differences in spatial ability giving reasons.

12

Suggested at least two ways to modify theexperiment to make the results more generalizable.

20

Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner;demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attributionof sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

20

Total:

100

No matter what kind of paper writing service you need, we’ll get it written. Place Your Order Now!
× How can I help you?